#Localization xbench software

There are a few other localization QA tools out there, but personally I donвЂ™t think there is a tool better than вЂXbenchвЂ™ in many ways. To be specific, the localization team performs QA in the CAT tools and uses an additional QA tool if it is still insufficient before delivery. However, each localization team works hard to minimize the error rate and using QA tools is a part of that effort. Therefore, вЂ0% of error rateвЂ™ is considered impossible. Localization is a process done by a human being.

Now, letвЂ™s take a look at the types and purposes of tools. As you deal with a diversity of projects, the name of tools introduced in this article may pop up in your mind one day and help you to improve the efficiency of your localization process.Д¬hoose a Proper Tool Depending on Your Purpose! You donвЂ™t have to go into the details right now, but I hope you look through this article at least. On the other hand, the вЂauxiliary toolвЂ™ can be helpful for a localization manager at game companies or a PM at localization agencies who are working on a localization project with a large number of files, a complex structure, and frequent updates. If you are a freelance translator, the QA function built into CAT tools will be sufficient to check and verify the translation work assigned to you before delivery to LSP. As CAT tools developed, various functions, especially QA functions, were added. In the last article, I mentioned that CAT tools have developed tremendously compared to the past. (I would like to inform you that I am out of all relation to the company of the tools introduced below.)Д¬AT tools, which are mainly used in localization, are not just tools simply for translation. Therefore, in this article, we will look at вЂauxiliary toolsвЂ™ that can improve efficiency in addition to the main translation tools. However, additional tools are occasionally needed when the number of files to deal with is large and even the structure of text files is complicated due to variables or tags. The CAT tools introduced in the last article are mainly used for game localization. Which CAT tool is the Best for the Game Localization? ) In that sense, we discussed which CAT tool is suitable for game localization in the last article, and many people gave feedback that the information was helpful.

#Localization xbench software

Now that there are a lot of different software for translation in the market and using a proper tool became an important factor to achieve efficiency. However, in fact, it is also an area that requires the ability to use various tools and software including CAT tools at your command. If you don't, then don't use it.When you think about game localization, you may think вЂisnвЂ™t it enough to have a good translation skill or language skill?вЂ™. Such arguments resemble discussions about religion and serve no purpose. I am not interested in getting involved in arguments about what various tools can do and trying to prove that one is better than another. I will show you SDL Trados Studio can do it too (much better than that)'. Many times I have found number errors (particulary added numbers) that Trados QA has not caught, particularly in memories provided to me, presumably because the previous translator has configured the number checking to reduce all the false positives.

For example, it flags this: 122,45 в‚¬ > в‚¬122.45 as an error because it doesn't like the currency symbol stuck to the number. Depending on how Studio is configured, it either throws up lots of false positives or it misses errors. Number checking is far better than in Studio, even with the Number Verifier plugin installed. All potential errors are shown grouped together across the entire project and can be ignored en masse instead of having to tediously look at hundreds of individual messages. QA is much more configurable than in Trados Studio, with checklists that can be programmed to look for common dictation errors (such as the French word 'principe' being translated as 'principal' instead of 'principle') and that can be configured in ways that Studio termbases cannot.

All I want in my CAT tool termbase are entries relating to the current project (for automatic QA) and nothing else.ДЄs regards QA, spellchecking is far better than in any CAT tool because only one instance of questionable spelling is flagged and, if necessary, these can be corrected en masse in the CAT tool. I don't want these loaded into a CAT tool termbase because it would slow it down to a crawl and every source segment would flag entries that would be irrelevant to the current project. My XBench termbase is kept loaded into live memory and currently contains 1,795,217 entries. XBench serves two completely unrelated functions, terminology management and QA.